精品玖玖玖视频在线观看-综合狠狠-久久99久久99精品免视看婷婷-www欧美日韩-在线天堂资源www-午夜九九九-国产福利资源在线-色婷婷久久综合-天堂在线成人-久久婷婷激情综合色综合俺也去-麻花豆传媒剧国产免费mv在线-秋霞二区-国产不卡在线播放-操操网-国产亚洲一区二区手机在线观看-色爱五月天-久久久久国色αv免费观看-青青草原精品资源站久久-日韩在线欧美-蜜桃色一区二区三区

  • 法律圖書館

  • 新法規(guī)速遞

  • WTO Dispute Settlement Mechanism(1)

    [ 劉成偉 ]——(2003-7-7) / 已閱44637次

    II Generic Third Party Rights: Interpretation of Art. 10.3
    III Extended Third Party Rights: Exercise of Panels’ Discretion
    IV Summary and Conclusions
    Chapter IV Function of Panels: Art. 11 of the DSU
    I Introduction
    II Application of Art. 11 as a General Standard of Review
    III Review in “neither de novo nor total defence”
    IV Allegation against Panels’ Standard of Review
    V Exercise of Judicial Economy
    Chapter V Guidelines for Interpretation of the WTO Covered Agreements
    I Introduction
    II Application of Arts. 31, 32 of the Vienna Convention
    III WTO Rules on Conflicts: Effective Interpretation
    IV The Status of Legitimate Expectations in Interpretation
    Chapter VI General Rules of Evidence under the WTO Jurisprudence
    I Burden of Proof under the WTO Jurisprudence
    (i) General Rules Well Established in Violation Complaints
    (ii) Burden of Proof in case of Invoking an Exception
    (iii) Special Rules Concerning Non-Violation Claims
    (iv) Summary and Conclusions
    II Admissibility of Certain Evidences
    (i) Evidence Obtained from Prior Consultations
    (a) Procedural Concern: Confidentiality of Consultations
    (b) Substantial Concern: Necessity or Relevance of Evidence
    (ii) Arguments before Domestic Investigative Authorities
    (iii) Arguments Submitted after the First Substantive Meeting
    (a) There is a significant difference between the claims and the arguments supporting those claims.
    (b)There is no provision establishing precise deadlines for the presentation of evidence.
    III Panel’s Right to Seek Information
    (i) A Grant of Discretionary Authority
    (ii) The Admissibility of Non-requested Information
    (iii) Summary and Conclusions
    IV Adverse Inferences from Party’s Refusal to Provide Information Requested
    (i) The Authority of a Panel to Request Information from a Party to the Dispute
    (ii) The Duty of a Member to Comply with the Request of a Panel to Provide Information
    (iii) The Drawing of Adverse Inferences from the Refusal of a Party to Provide Information Requested by the Panel
    V Concluding Remarks
    Chapter VII Special Rules for Anti-dumping Disputes
    Section One Recourse of Anti-dumping Disputes to the DSB
    I Introduction
    II Sufficiency of Panel Request under the AD Agreement
    (i) Art. 6.2 of the DSU and Article 17.4 of the AD Agreement
    (ii) Art. 6.2 of the DSU and Article 17.5(i) of the AD Agreement
    (iii) A Summary Guiding
    III General Legal Basis for Claims against Legislation as Such
    IV Special Rules for Claims against Anti-dumping Legislation as Such
    (i) Introduction
    (ii)General Legal Basis under Art. 17 of the AD Agreement
    (iii) Understanding of Art. 17.4 of the AD Agreement
    (iv) Extensive Basis in Context

    總共5頁  [1] [2] 3 [4] [5]

    上一頁    下一頁

    ==========================================

    免責(zé)聲明:
    聲明:本論文由《法律圖書館》網(wǎng)站收藏,
    僅供學(xué)術(shù)研究參考使用,
    版權(quán)為原作者所有,未經(jīng)作者同意,不得轉(zhuǎn)載。

    ==========================================

    論文分類

    A 法學(xué)理論

    C 國家法、憲法

    E 行政法

    F 刑法

    H 民法

    I 商法

    J 經(jīng)濟法

    N 訴訟法

    S 司法制度

    T 國際法


    Copyright © 1999-2021 法律圖書館

    .

    .